SEXUAL ABUSE AND TREATMENT
By Jurriaan Plesman BA(Psych), Post Grad Dip Clin Nutr
The community demands that men who commit horrendous crimes, such as rape and pedophilia, be brought to justice and sentenced, so as to protect all members of society against their predatory behaviour.
The question is what happens to these men after they have been placed under the control of the state. Is their any hope for their rehabilitation? If so, what prompted these men to offend against the moral and legal standards of society? What flaws in their personality brought them into conflict with civilization and if so, can these be 'treated'. More importantly, how can we prevent these crimes after having gained some insight into the contributory factors of sexual abuse? Some of these issues are discussed in this article.
From a definitional point of view many questions arise, such as whether marital infidelity or prostitution is a form of sexual abuse. When women are brought into prostitution against their will, this would be sexual abuse. Is fetishism sexual abuse, when a person obtains sexual gratification from masturbating in the presence of lady’s underwear? Most would agree that rape, incest, inappropriate touching, pedophilia, exhibitionism, and physical or verbal harassment, exposing children to pornographic material or using children in the production of pornography all constitutes sexual abuse.
Whatever form sexual abuse takes it arouses very powerful emotions within us, that often prevent us from looking rationally at some of the causes of this kind of behaviour. This is especially so, when children are the victims, and usually perpetrators are not even safe from fellow inmates who subscribe to their own kind of violent justice in the prison system.
If we had some understanding of human sexuality it could help us prevent getting into situations of sexual abuse and also provide some treatment for those willing to change their behaviour. Remember that most sentenced sexual offenders are ultimately released into the community.
When we study these animals we see that there are vast differences in the sexual behaviour of males and females. When we observe mammalian animals we can only come to the conclusion that there is a lot of conflict - often violent from our point of view - between males and females.
One client reported to me that he felt constantly on heat. On the other hand, it has been claimed by some that a few women can live happily without any sexual activities. Studying the testosterone or other hormonal levels it must be realised that we are dealing with bell-shaped averages; some individuals (male or female) showing extremes at either ends of the distribution of measurements and some overlapping.
In one video recording it was shown that a male chimpanzee got very agitated when it watched a scene depicting a mating session between two other chimpanzees. Hence we have an explanation for the human male’s fascination with nude female bodies. The universal pornographic industry feeds on these primitive forces of visual stimulation, which leave most females rather cold.
The mechanism of sexual arousal is obviously different between males and females and in some cases this may be a cause of conflict. Thus we see how a ‘Peeping Tom’ is driven along by a puzzling inner drive to peer into windows of homes in the hope of encountering ladies in the process of undressing.
The belief promoted by some sections of the feminist movement - modelled on the behaviouristic model of psychology - that men and women are or should be the same in all respect may have brought about a confusion in the sexual education of young people. The fact is that there are vast sexual differences between the sexes lurking just below ‘civilised’ behaviour.
Lacking such modelling by male parents, it is often reported that rapists claim that their victim consented to their offence, because they are biologically inclined to recognise their own arousal in other people, through this process of ‘projection’, part of their ‘cognitive distortion’.
Some biologists would suggest that the role of copulation in the lower animals have made way for a more extensive function in humans. Whereas in the lower species its function is reproduction, among humans freedom from periodical pheromones has made the capacity for sex timeless, serving also as a bonding activity between the sexes. It could well be that without such bonding the long period of human nurturing of the young - sometimes reaching twenty years - may deprive the offspring the protection of the adults. Sex seems to play a similar social role among some groups of primates.
Whereas changes in the evolution in the lower animals are limited to the slow mutations in their genetic, the enlarged brain empowered humans to acquire ‘culture’, which accelerated the evolution of human behaviour by leaps and bounds, so that virtually a new species appeared on the surface of the earth out of the blue in terms of geological times. That ‘cultured’ animal appeared to behave in a totally different way from the members of his ancestry, who were locked into a rigid, instinctual predictable pattern of life.
Unfortunately, cultural evolution split the human community into different branches with often conflicting belief systems and behaviour patterns. And the genetic survival of the fittest among animals has now been converted to the struggle of fittest culture among human societies. War seems to be practically unavoidable and perhaps may be seen as a natural by-products of cultural evolution.
Women contribute to these cultural evolution by choosing men who are ‘civilised’, gentle, understanding, supportive, stable, all attributes to protect the ‘cultural’ offspring of the new species. By choosing and preferring such men, they may well have changed already some of the genetic make-up of this new humanoid species.
If this analysis is correct it becomes sensible to ask the question why some men in our society predominantly display genetic behaviour bringing them into conflict with moral if not legal standards of his society?
Sexual behaviour is controlled by powerful sanctions of one sort or other in all societies. This discloses the near submerged genetic behaviour in all of us. Genetic behaviour is not only restricted to sexual inclinations, but also to other aspects of human behaviour; such as the drive for power over fellow humans, the exploitation of the weak, economic ‘rivalry’, the pursuit of any kind of competition in games by individuals and groups.
We have only to see the atrocities committed by ‘civilised’ humans in the 21st century Europe, to realise how shallow ‘cultured’ behaviour is. These non-sexual genetic patterns of behaviour - which among humans know no boundaries - are seldom recognised as stemming from our animal ancestry.
Treatment of sexual offenders
The above analysis suggests that unacceptable sexual behaviour is the product of a disrupted socialisation in the development of personality. So we need to look at factors - both psychological and metabolic - that have hindered this socialisation of this person into a ‘cultured’ person of his society.
Psychological Factors
The above studies show that it is difficult to separate biochemical from psychological factors and that there is much interplay. But looking at the component parts, predominantly psychological factors may be detected.
When you ask: “How do you get on with your mother?”, the reply would be “OK”. In order to force them to express a whole sentence, it would be better to ask an open-ended question such as: “Tell me what is your mother like?”, where it would be difficult to answer in ‘two-word’ sentences. Such handicap in communication skills could result in sexually unacceptable behaviour.
These are some of the psychological examples we need to look for and treat, if we want to help a client overcome his recidivist sexual inclinations that are in conflict with societal norms.
Conclusion
Sexual offenders are likely to have little insight into their recidivist behaviour. Hence they need to be stopped by whatever means. The usual practice of incarcerating sexual abusers will do little for rehabilitating these offenders. On the contrary the unnatural social environment of jails can only be expected to entrench and reinforce the socially condemned sexual behaviour before he is released into the community again.
I have also found that the treatment of sexual offenders does not have to take place in a special group of “sexual offenders”. My groups that contained a mixture of offenders - not so much by design, but rather by necessity - all benefited from the metabolic/psychological therapeutic approach regardless of the type of offences. There was great emphasis on self-therapy and clients taking responsibility for their own therapy with the tools (lectures and interview exercises, discussions) provided in the group.
The treatment of sexual abuse must include considerations of metabolic and biochemical factors - such as hypoglycemia - that contribute to otherwise recidivist behaviour. To assist in a proper analysis of his biochemical personality he may be asked to have himself tested such as a special GTT for hypoglycemia explained at this web site. These factors need to be treated first, preferably by nutritional means. AND the person needs to undergo a course in PSYCHOTHERAPY to provide him with means of leading a more acceptable and satisfactory social life.
He needs to be offered opportunities for resocialization both metabolically and psychologically.
Last updated 17 December, 2006.5